The UK government has made an announcement about a ground-breaking agreement that addresses the management of the most high-risk AI technologies.
This involves so called “frontier AI” – allegedly most advanced variants of AI with totally unrecognisable traits.
At the UK’s AI Safety Summit, this agreement was made by participating countries such as the US, the EU, and China.
Prior to the meeting, Elon Musk, an AI attendee, had a warning as he stated AI could result in total human annihilation.
However, other participants who caution against anticipating improbable threat scenarios from space and warn that the world should rather consider what can be happening today with regards to how AI may replace some jobs or further reinforce prejudice.
King Charles has also made a prerecorded statement that has classified invention of sophisticated artificial intelligence as equally crucial as the discovery of electricity.
He said that “just like that we should act against AI risks with speed, unity and power”.
In addition, the UK government has stated that 28 nations have agreed in the Bletchley Declaration – a document that signatories have signed on which they say there are significant needs to understand and jointly handle possible Artificial Intelligence risks.
The prime minister, Rishi sunak says it is “a landmark decision where the planet’s best Ai powers see the urgency in uncovering the potential dangers of Ai – thereby ensuring future sustainability for our children and generations to come.”
The necessity of a global framework has been emphasized by other nations as well.
The ties between China and the west have their troubles in most areas, even though the Vice Minister Wu Zhaohui said that the country seeks a culture of transparency in artificial intelligence at the conference.
According to him, delegates should work together across the globe to discuss and let people have access to AI tools.
Called “frontier AI”, or perhaps not, but what ministers refer to as the ultimate stage of an advanced form of the technology that still has some unspecified potentialities..”
At the UK’s AI safety summit, countries like the US, the EU and China signed a deal that was called “the agreement”.
During this meeting, Elon Musk – an attendee and also Tesla’s owner warned that mankind may be wiped out by AI.
However, other participants have cautioned of projecting unlikely future dangers and advised that the world should rather concentrate on likely current day dangers artificial intelligence could bring in, such as displacing work positions or consolidating prejudice.
King Charles’s pre-recorded statement said that the advancement of AI is no less important than the discovery of electricity.
We must also approach AI risk in the same manner as we would time and money he added.
UK Government stated that in total 28 nations support Bletchey declaration that states about high level urgency in comprehending and managing artificial intelligence threats collectively.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak described it as a “milestone towards understanding the dangers and pitfalls associated with artificial intelligence; something which is important if we are to preserve our children and grandchildren’s legacy as well as safeguard their future”.
Several other countries, like America has equally insisted on a world-wide approach towards controlling the technology.
The vice minister Wu Zhaohua also added that relations between China and the West were tense on many issues—although, the country’s leadership is trying to make the industry as open as possible toward its competitors, including those from the West.
He also told delegates that, “we need to work together to share knowledge on AI technologies with the public”.
At the same time, Gina Raimondo, the US Secretary of Commerce, shared that the United States plans to establish its own AI Safety Institute after the summit.
Michelle Donelan, the UK Technology Secretary, who presided over the initial statements, disclosed that the upcoming summit will be conducted in a virtual format and will be hosted by the Republic of Korea in six months.
Following that, the next in-person gathering is scheduled to take place in France one year from now.
Somebody else’s prediction about AI is Elon Musk who appeared in a podcast of joe Rogan saying some people might even use AI against humans for protecting the planet which may imply ending human life.
The implication of it is if you start concluding that “humans are bad” then humans should die, he said.
“If AI is created by extinctionists then their utility function would be Human extinction … they wouldn’t even realize that it was a bad thing.”
The meeting with UK’s PM is scheduled on 31 January and he spoke prior to the UKAI safety summit.
Numerous experts regard such warnings as exaggerated.
The summit was attended by other notable person like Nick Clegg – the current global affairs vice-president in Meta who served as a deputy prime minister. He urged people not to be carried away with “sometimes speculative future predictions and predictions”.
The AI doomsday prediction was made by Elon Musk who told comedian Joe Rogan’s podcast that some people would use AI to save the planet through eradication of human race on Tuesday.
“If you begin feeling that all humans should perish then it would be wise to stop thinking this,” he said.
Extinctionists could get their hands on a tool and program “AI”. Its utility function would become extinction of human race … such a thing wouldn’t dawn on them.
The comment came before this week’s AI safety summit in the UK where the vice president will be discussing with UK’s PM.
Indeed, such warnings are regarded by many experts as exaggerated.
According to Nick Clegg, the present president of global affairs at Meta and former Deputy PM who is visiting the assembly, people should not allow “speculative, sometimes somewhat futuristic predictions” displace the more immediate challenges.
Environmentalist being ready to do whatever it takes to shrink the size of humanity in the world is a stock issue for deniers of global warming popular social networks.
In that regards, some people term climate activists as death cult people who would want to implement a population control measures including compulsory sterilization.
None of these assertions has been proven true and it would be impossible to convince anybody within the mainstream climate scientists or environmentalists who support such measures.
It is also true that the most populous countries in the world have among the lowest atmospheric emission levels per person.
Since there is a popular view among climate change deniers on social media, which involves suggestions regarding environmentalists going to extreme lengths just in order to reduce the world’s population.
To much of those users, the climate change activists comprise a sect that is known as “the death cult” seeking population reduction by draconian methods including compulsory abstinence through forced sterilization.
None of these statements has been backed by scientific data, and you would surely find few environmentalists or scientists willing to support these initiatives as part of climate change mitigation.
In this case, while there has been an increased pressure on the world’s natural resources as populations increase, some of the biggest countries in terms of population size have recorded few emissions per capita.
A common viewpoint among many is that the most significant concern regarding AI lies in the automation of jobs, as well as the potential for embedding existing biases and prejudices into new, greatly enhanced online systems.
Leave a Reply