As Doritos, Walkers and Wotsits speed along a conveyor belt at Coventry’s PepsiCo factory – where some of the UK’s most popular crisps are made – the noise of whirring machinery is almost deafening.

However, in this case, it is not any old human workers looking for sign of breakdown beyond all the noise of the factory.

In addition, sensors connected to different elements of devices also listen for cues on hardware flaws, having learnt what old and tired machines sound like that threaten to stop production lines completely.

After a successful USA trial, these sensors created by tech company Augury and fueled with artificial intelligence are being deployed by PepsiCo across its factories.

One of the companies trying out ways AI may help boost factory efficiency without wastage or delays before retail shelf is one such example from what are increasingly seen as a wave of new manufacturing.

The large quantities of data that it can handle has already made its mark in helping manufacturers in preemptive measures against disruptive tendencies.

Factory downtime for a single period of one minute could run into tens of thousands in lost earnings. Additionally, if additional delays lead to missed opportunities during special times such as Christmas or even during Black Friday then some consumers may miss their window of purchase.

Therefore, monitoring devices are increasingly commonplace on factory floors, capable of checking and examining processes in real time; anticipating forthcoming problems and exploiting recorded history to suggest corrective measures.For instance, the sensors applied by PepsiCo have been trained on vast amounts of sound data in

“Today we analyse and monitor more than 300 million machine hours and we are able to exploit all that data to devise algorithms capable of locating particular failure patterns”, said Augury’s CEO, Saar Yoskovitz.

In simple terms, factories are using smart technology to gather information about the health of their machines. This helps workers predict when a machine might break down, allowing them to schedule maintenance beforehand and prevent unexpected errors. Using AI-powered sensors also helps reduce waste in the production process.

For instance, AI technology like computer vision is being employed to identify defects in products as they move along conveyor belts in factories. This is especially crucial for intricate items like computer chips, where tiny defects might be overlooked by the human eye. AI, through cameras and algorithms, can spot these defects and ensure better product quality.

According to Alexandra Brintrup, a professor at the University of Cambridge, AI is not only improving efficiency in manufacturing but also opening up new possibilities. These include sharing production capacities between manufacturers, enhancing visibility in supply chains, and even optimizing logistics, like sharing trucks.

One significant use of AI is in unraveling the complexities of supply chains. By analyzing and predicting suppliers’ information, companies can identify bottlenecks, and consumers can gain insights into the origins and materials used in products. For example, AI can help track the use of ingredients like palm oil, even when disguised under different names on product labels. This transparency is crucial as society becomes more environmentally and socially conscious.

In summary, AI is revolutionizing manufacturing by making processes more efficient, improving product quality, and increasing transparency in the supply chain.

This is especially true as it refers to the manufacturing landscape where they ask themselves what implications the increasing use of AI tools on factory floors and other places within the wider supply chain will have for workers.

Consequently, some companies examine the implementation of AI in monitoring the security of production line workers who are around machines with machine-learning and computer vision techniques by analyzing factory cameras’ footage.

In the meantime, companies such as PepsiCo are deploying wearables powered by artificial intelligence across warehouses in Britain in a bid to avoid injuries among the employees who are repeatedly tasked with carrying heavy loads. David Schwartz, PepsiCo’s global vice president at

He said “it’s improving how people work, so we may give more efficiency for our people, or customers and get ready to face up the future to provide them services on a day to day basis”.

Will the emerging use of AI devices in factories and elsewhere in the supply chain mean anything to workers?

A few firms are examining ways through which artificial intelligence can be used for enhancing safety of production line workers in close proximity of machines – by applying machine learning, and computer vision approaches to monitor the manufacturing facility’s camera video feed to find likely accidents, risks, etc.

On the other hand, AI wearable technologies such as exoskeleton have been rolled out in United Kingdom’s warehouses to prevent those involved in repetitive lifting of bulky materials from suffering overstraining and bodily injury.David Schwartz, PepsiCo Labs

He states: “it is assisting us in improving how people work to achieve more efficiency to serve the people we have, our customers, and prepare us for tomorrow to cater to them every day”.

Sam Altman will step down from his role as chief executive of Open AI LP after the company found that he “was not consistently candid” with the board.

There are no details as to how those things could have happened, and neither is there a date or an announcement of this abrupt leadership change from the company’s side. Mira Murati, the OpenAI chief technology officer, will function as interim CEO while the replacement is being sorted out. The search for candidates has already been initiated by the company. Greg Brockman, also resigned as the president of OpenAI on Friday.

The statement added that Altman left following a board review after the company concluded its performance analysis and compensation committee review. Therefore, it said that “he did not provide full disclosure to the board on regular basis and therefore it cannot be able to perform its mandate”. “OpenAI does not have any confidence in his leadership abilities.”

Some observers say OpenAI’s approach, is rather a strange one. Boards of leading tech companies rarely sack CEOs, and most times the circumstances surrounding this high profile removal stay undisclosed.

And it was sudden: However, the New York Times noted that although Altman had been in Oakland, California, on Thursday evening and was hosting an event there, he did not give any sign of his looming exit. Apparently, the decision did not even have prior notice given to microsoft before it was made.

Certain of the board’s concerns toward Altman could not be found during Friday afternoon, and according to later news in the evening, it was the fact that the board, specifically the chief scientist of Ilya Sutskever (the question regarding safety is growing on AI models) considered Alt.

Artificial Intelligence Developer announces new leadership change! As an interim measure, Mira Murati, OpenAI’s chief technology officer, will step in as an acting CEO, until a substantive replacement is found. It is already searching for suitable candidate. Greg Brockman, president of OpenAI, said he’s also quitting on Friday.

According to openai, altman left after a board of directors review. Accordingly, the company mentioned that “his lack of openness affected the board’s duties of governance on him”. That is, the board did not believe in his capability to proceed managing OpenAI.

However, it was a bit odd for some observers on how the OpenAI handled this situation. CEOs of successful tech companies are rarely forced out by directors, and the reason why is often never made public.

And it was sudden: According to the New York Times, Altman did not give any hints that he was leaving since he appeared at a function in Oakland, California on Thursday night. Apparently, the company only informed Microsoft about this just several hours before the agreement took place.

Specific problems of the board with Altman were not obvious Friday evening, but the later reports at night stated that, above all the Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever, thought that Altman was speeding up and did not pay enough attention to the safety.

Certainly, the brutal nature of its presentation indicates problems other than difficulties in the commercial area.yahrpage. Tech journalist and podcast host Kara Swisher heard from sources that Open AI’s profit and the opposers did not match and the developer day was also not right. Additionally, they pointed out that there could be more significant departures.

An amusing possible clue was actually in Altman’s announcement upon leaving the firm, in the final sentence. While Open AI has grown massively, it continues to be the primary responsibility by the board to advance Open AI’s mission and maintain the principles embodied in the charter. It is a short note where Open AI pledges ensuring safety to any AGI system the company may invent in future.

In a subsequent post on X, Swisher suggested this might be at the crux of the clash: According to her: “I heard chief scientist Ilya Sutskever drove it. He got the board to support him against Sam Altmann and Greg Brockman who were pushing too much and fast as they wanted to be seen as leaders by making changes to the direction and growth of Open My bet: By Monday, he will have a newly established business running.

Another story in The Information claimed that Altman had been deemed quick on making decisions and overlooking safety matters. However, others think there must be something else behind this, taking into account the strong tone of the board press release.

On the other hand, Altman wrote on X that “I liked my experience at Open AI”. this is what was truly transformative for me and may be some change in the world a wee bit. I enjoyed working with such great people above everything else. They shall have even more to say concerning things to come in future.

Later that evening, Brockman took to X, pouring out his feelings about the board’s decision. He expressed shock and sadness, assuring everyone that he and Sam were taken aback by the sudden move and hinted at something greater on the horizon.

Adding more insight, Swisher shared thoughts on X during the late hours, shedding light on the dissenting board members’ perspective. They believed Altman to be manipulative and headstrong, wanting to forge his own path. Swisher mused that this might be typical behavior for a Silicon Valley CEO, but the uniqueness of OpenAI as a company raised questions. There was a call for transparency, urging the board to provide specifics about their concerns and evidence of attempts to communicate with Altman before making such a drastic decision. The situation, if mishandled, appeared clumsy.

The roster of OpenAI’s board includes notable figures such as Sutskever, Quora Inc. CEO Adam D’Angelo, tech entrepreneur Tasha McCauley, and Helen Toner from the Georgetown Center for Security and Emerging Technology. Until today, Sam Altman and Brockman held director positions. Although Brockman announced his departure from the board, the company clarified that he would continue working at OpenAI in his existing role.

OpenAI, founded in 2015 with a substantial $1 billion backing, aimed to pioneer advanced AI models. Altman, a founding team member, took the reins as CEO in 2019, having previously led the Y Combinator startup accelerator.

Under Altman’s leadership, OpenAI achieved significant milestones, launching the widely acclaimed ChatGPT chatbot. This success attracted attention, leading to a $10 billion investment from Microsoft in January at a $29 billion valuation. By October, OpenAI boasted an annualized revenue run rate of $1.3 billion and aspired to be valued as high as $86 billion.

Microsoft’s considerable investment in Open AI has now made the leadership change a pivotal moment for the tech giant. Speculation arose about Microsoft taking proactive measures to manage any potential fallout, with a 1.7% drop in its stock possibly reflecting the impact of the Open AI news. The situation remains dynamic, and the industry is keenly watching how it unfolds.

Sarbjeet Johal, a tech analyst, pointed out that there seemed to be tension between OpenAI and Microsoft during the AI event last week. It was also surprising that Altman didn’t show up at Microsoft’s conference this week, especially considering the recent announcement of the ChatGPT-driven Copilot across various Microsoft products. Johal mentioned that OpenAI faced competition from open-source generative AI models, including Meta Platforms Inc.’s Llama.

OpenAI’s new interim CEO, Murati, has been with the company since 2018. In her role as CTO, she played a key role in developing ChatGPT and other products like the DALL-E series for image generation. Before becoming CEO, Murati already led three crucial units at OpenAI: research, product, and AI safety.

Brockman, in a statement on X, expressed shock and sadness about the board’s decision. He and Sam thanked everyone they worked with, acknowledging the support received. They were still trying to understand the situation. According to Brockman, Sam learned about his firing in a Google Meet with the board, excluding Greg. Around the same time, Greg received a message from Ilya, leading to his removal from the board while retaining his role. OpenAI published a blog post simultaneously. The management team, except for Mira who found out the night before, learned of the situation shortly after. Brockman reassured everyone of their well-being and hinted at exciting things to come.

Altman, sharing on X, described the day as a strange experience, akin to reading his own eulogy while still alive. He expressed gratitude for the outpouring of love and encouraged people to appreciate their friends.

In response to the unfolding events, Matei Zaharia, CTO of Databricks Inc., mentioned on X that they were hiring for AI research positions, emphasizing their mission to democratize AI.

A senior executive at the tech firm Stability AI has resigned over the company’s view that it is acceptable to use copyrighted work without permission to train its products.

Ed Newton-Rex used to lead the audio team at a company based in the UK and US. He recently stepped down, telling the BBC that he finds it “exploitative” for AI developers to use creative work without getting permission.

Many big AI companies, like Stability AI, argue that using copyright content is “fair use.” This means they think they can use original content without needing permission from the owners.

Right now, the US copyright office is looking into generative AI and policy issues.

Newton-Rex wants to make it clear that he’s talking about all AI companies that share this view – and most of them do. In response to a former colleague on Twitter, the founder of Stability AI, Emad Mostaque, said the firm believes fair use “supports creative development.”

AI tools get trained using a ton of data, often taken from the internet without permission. Generative AI, which creates things like images, audio, video, and music, can then make similar material or even mimic the style of a specific artist if asked.

Newton-Rex, who is also a choral composer, wouldn’t be keen on giving his own music to AI developers for free. He believes that many creators produce content with the hope that their copyright will be valuable someday. However, without permission, their work is being used to create competition and might even replace them.

Newton-Rex previously built an AI audio creator for his old company called Stability Audio. He chose to license the data used for training and share revenue with rights holders. He admits that this approach might not work for everyone.

He remains optimistic about the benefits of AI and doesn’t plan to leave the industry. He hopes that globally, people will adopt an approach that says, “you need to get permission from the people who wrote it; otherwise, it’s not okay.”

Using copyright material to train AI tools is a hot topic. Some creatives, like comedian Sarah Silverman and Game of Thrones writer George RR Martin, have taken legal action against AI firms, claiming their work was taken without permission.

Earlier this year, a track featuring AI-generated voices of music artists Drake and The Weeknd got removed from Spotify after it was discovered that it was created without their consent. However, the boss of Spotify later said he wouldn’t completely ban AI from the platform.

Stability AI faced legal action from the Getty image archive, accusing them of scraping millions of pictures for training their AI image generator, Stable Diffusion. Some news organizations, including the BBC and The Guardian, have blocked AI firms from using their material from the internet.